When you place your order through Biblio, the seller will ship it directly to you. This reflects the percentage of orders the seller has received and filled. Stars are assigned as follows:. Inventory on Biblio is continually updated, but because much of our booksellers' inventory is uncommon or even one-of-a-kind, stock-outs do happen from time to time. If for any reason your order is not available to ship, you will not be charged. Your order is also backed by our In-Stock Guarantee! Since we launched in , Biblio has remained committed to preserving our natural resources and environment and helping to reduce the adverse factors that contribute to pollution and the climate crisis.
Sign In Register Help Cart. Cart items. Toggle navigation. Stock photo. Search Results Results 1 -9 of 9. Light soiling and shelfwear to covers.
Spine ends mildly bumped. Textblock mildly soiled. Pages clean and tight in binding. Pictures available upon request. They exploit technology as much as possible to express themselves, and thus install the paradoxes of time in contemporary subjectivity. As a narrative experiment, 24 is structured as a story in real time, with each chapter dedicated to one hour in the life of the characters and one day for each season. Beyond any possible genealogy of seriality that can be made in art history, one of the main phenomena that the current series poses is the absence of a clear end, a well-defined quilting point, that re-signifies the plot.
This absence or distortion constitutes a key coordinate to understand that tonality of urgency of contemporary anxiety. We are talking about the subjective urgency in times of the non-existence of the Other. Paradoxically, the Other does not exist and Time does not stop. These are times in which the word is hardly a scansion, so we are in a period very different from the Freudian one. I can tell you that right now, amongst those who are analysts, and who think - which already limits thefield- there isn't perhaps a single one who, deep down, has the same conception as any other of his contemporaries or peers as to what one does, what one aims to do, what one achieves, what is going on in analysis.
It has even got to the point where we could amuse ourselves with the little game of comparing the most extreme conceptions - we would see that they arrive at formulations which are strictly contradictory. Without even seeking out those who cherish paradoxes - anyhow, there aren't that many of them. The question is of such import that the various theoreticians tackle it with no inclination to whimsicality, and humour, in general, is excluded from their laborious pontifications on therapeutic results, their forms, their procedures.
They content themselves with hanging on to a balustrade, to a guard-rail offered by some corner or another of Freud's theoretical system. This alone gives each of them the guarantee that he is still communicating with those who are his fellow-analysts and colleagues.
The Freudian language acts as the go-between by which a channel of communication is kept open between practitioners who hold to manifestly different conceptions of their therapeutic activity, and, what is more, of the general form of this interhuman relation called psychoanalysis.
The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book I: Freud's Papers on Technique 1953-1954
When I say interhuman relation, you can already see that I am describing things the way they are today. Indeed, the elaboration of the notion of the relation between analyst and analysand is the path taken by contemporary analytic doctrines in trying to rediscover afirmbasis for the realities of that experience. Certainly jit represents the most fertile line of thought traced out since Freud's death.
Balint calls it a two-body psychology3 - a term which, in fact, is not his, but which he borrowedfromthe late Rickman, one of the rare souls to have had a modicum of theoretical originality in analytic circles since Freud's death. The imaginary inter-reaction between analysand and analyst is thus something we shall have to take into consideration.
Does this mean that this is the way to locate our problem precisely? On the one hand, yes. On the other, no. It is very worthwhile to stimulate research of this character in as much as it highlights the originality of what is at stake when compared to a one-body psychology,5 the conventional constructive psychology. But is it sufficient to say that we are dealing with a relation between two individuals? It is in this way that we are brought to recognise the impasses into which theories of technique are currently led.
I am not in a position to say more to you about this for the moment - even though, as those who are old hands in this seminar know, you are obviously aware that there is no two-body psychology5 without the intervention of a third element. If, as we must, we take speech as the central feature of our perspective, then it is within a three- rather than two-term relation that we have to formulate the analytic experience in its totality.
English in the original. See John Rickman.
Freud's Papers on Technique, - Jacques Lacan - Google книги
Selected Contributions to Psycho-analysis, compiled by W. Scott, with an introductory memoir by S. Payne, London: Hogarth Press ancKhe Institute of Psycho analysis, 19 5 7, in particular 'The factor of number in individual- and group-dynamics' pp. Balint's phrase is 'two-person psychology'.
Which doesn't mean to say that we cannot express fragments, pieces and tail-ends of it in other registers. In that way you can grasp the kind of obstacles the theoreticians have come up against.
- Freuds Papers on Technique: - Jacques Lacan - Google книги!
- The Power of Yoga.
- Account Options.
It's really very easy to understand - if the foundation of the inter-analytic relation is truly something that we are obliged to represent as being triadic, there are a number of different ways of choosing two elements from out of this triad. You can put the accent on one or other of the three dyadic relations that are set up within it.
As you will see, this furnishes a practical means of classifying a certain number of theoretical elaborations concerning technique that have been proposed. I am going to remind you quickly of Freud's seminal experience which I mentioned earlier on, since in fact that is what was partly the object of our lectures of last term, totally centred as they were on the notion that the complete reconstitution of the subject's history is the element that is essential, constitutive and structural for analytic progress.
I believe that I have demonstrated that that is where Freud started from. What is at issue for him is the understanding of an individual case. That is what gives each of the five great case-histories their value. The three that we have already looked at, pondered over and worked on together in previous years show you just that. Freud's progress, the discoveries he made, lies in the way he considers the singularity of a case.
Consider it in its singularity, what does that mean? That means essentially that, for him, the interest, the essence, the basis, the dimension proper to analysis is the rintgration by the subject of his history right up to the furthermost perceptible limits, that is to say into a dimension that goes well beyond the limits of the individual.
To lay the foundations, deduce it, demonstrate it employing a thousand subtleties in Freud's texts, is what we have accomplished together over the last few years. What reveals this dimension is the accent that Freud puts in each case on those points that it is essential to overcome by means of the technique and which are what I will call the bearings [situations] of the history. Does this amount to placing the accent on the past, as it may appear at first sight? I showed you that it is not as simple as that. History is not the past. History is the past in so far as it is historicised in the present - historicised in the present because it was lived in the past.
The path of restitution of the subject's history takes the form of a quest for the restitution of the past. We should consider this restitution as the butt to be aimed at by the recourses of technique. Throughout Freud's works, in which, as I have told you, technical suggestions are to be found at every turn, you will discover that the restitution of the past retained its prominent position in his preoccupations right to the end. That is why the very questions which are opened up by Freud's discovery are raised by this restitution of the past, and they turn out to be none other than the questions which up to now have been avoided, skirted round, in analysis I mean, namely those which bear on the function of time in the realisation of the human subject.
When we return to the origin of the Freudian experience - when I say origin, I do not mean historical origin but point-source - one realises that this is what has always kept analysis alive, despite the profoundly different garbs it has been given.
Again and again, Freud emphasises the restitution of the past, even when, with the conception of the three agencies - you will see that one can even talk of four -'he gives a considerable extension to the structural point of view, favouring thereby a certain orientation which will increasingly focus on the analytic relation in the present, on the here and now of the session, between the four walls of analysis.